If we do a bit of memory, in a previous post we asked ourselves a mental issue on price people have or whether to really are not for sale.
Survey responses in the comments were very divided between white, black and gray gamma choosing a different answer depending on the context of the moment, it is difficult to draw a clear conclusion.
The introduction makes sense then, because every day we see new public figures who put a price on his private life and sell parts of this in exchange for a large sum of money through an exclusive or an assembly and over time claiming the right to privacy that they were the first to expose the public to have some sort of interest within the press pink . In each case, justice is the dilemma of prioritizing the right to inform or right to privacy, honor and own image reflected in Articles 18 and 20 respectively of the Constitution English.
One example would be if a celebrity sells their wedding unique because it is in a happy and has no qualms about exposing the public in the event that there is a separation, is entitled to claim privacy? or in this case the consuming public and financed his bond has a right to be informed of breaking even this happening personal wrong time?
In conclusion, when a person at any time for cash exposes parts of their privacy and do not work, can claim to advocate a right to privacy that it sold or enter a vicious circle difficult to quit?
................... PRIVACY INFO OR ?................... Question
Mental 
0 comments:
Post a Comment